Sign inGet started
Skills / Productivity-habits

Ivy Lee Method

Try it for as long as you like, and then send me a check for whatever you think it's worth.

The Ivy Lee Method is a century-old daily prioritization framework built on three hard constraints: exactly six tasks per day, ranked strictly by importance (not urgency), executed one at a time in sequence until each is done. Originally taught to executives at Bethlehem Steel in 1918 — and paid for with a $25,000 check — the method's power comes not from complexity but from the ruthless forcing function those constraints create. It is for anyone who ends their day having been busy but uncertain whether they worked on what actually mattered.

By Ivy Lee · Free
Specimen 01 · Live diagnosisIvy Lee Method
Input

“Okay... I need to finish the Q2 forecast, respond to about 30 emails, prep for a team meeting Thursday, review a contract my lawyer sent, start the…”

Diagnosis
Let's build your Ivy Lee list for tomorrow — six tasks, ranked by importance, ready before you close up for the day.
Full transcript ↓
Calibrated referenceagent-skills.ai
The gap

Write six tasks. Rank them by importance. Don't start #2 until #1 is done.

The Ivy Lee Method operates in two phases repeated every working day. The planning phase happens at end of day: write down exactly six tasks you need to accomplish tomorrow — no more, no fewer — and rank them in strict order of true importance (not urgency, not ease). The execution phase happens the following morning: begin immediately on task #1 and work on it exclusively until it is complete, then move to #2. Any tasks unfinished at day's end carry forward to the next day's list of six, where they compete anew for priority slots rather than inheriting their position by default. Three interlocking constraints make the system work: the hard cap of six forces genuine trade-offs and eliminates list-bloat; the importance-based ranking separates consequential work from urgency theater; the serial-focus rule eliminates context-switching and ensures the most important task gets uninterrupted attention first.

The problem

Most task lists are graveyards of good intentions — 20-item backlogs where urgent but trivial items crowd out the work that actually moves things forward. Without a hard cap and a sequencing rule, workers context-switch constantly, finish the day feeling busy but not productive, and wake up the next morning still deciding what to do first. The Ivy Lee Method breaks this pattern with a daily reckoning: you can only commit to six tasks, and importance — not noise — determines their order.

The solution

Stop ending your days without a plan and starting them without direction. Each session produces a locked six-item list so tomorrow morning you already know exactly what to work on first — and you don't move to #2 until #1 is done.

You bring
  • Your full pile of pending tasks, commitments, and open loops — however long or messy
  • Honesty about what truly moves the needle vs. what merely feels pressing
  • Willingness to accept the hard cap: only six tasks make tomorrow's list
  • Any unfinished items carried over from previous days
You get
  • A finalized, ranked list of exactly six tasks for tomorrow — locked before you close your laptop
  • Clarity on the importance vs. urgency distinction so your #1 slot reflects real priority, not the loudest deadline
  • A carry-forward log that ensures nothing is dropped while enforcing fresh daily re-prioritization
  • A repeatable end-of-day ritual you can run in under ten minutes, every working day
In action

Watch the methodology work.

Three specimens from a single real session: the same situation, unaided and calibrated, the full transcript, and the skill answering live in the channel where the work happens.

Fig.01The same situation, two ways
Specimens A · B
Specimen AVague
Unaided

“You're staring at a task list with 19 items. By noon you've handled 35 emails, sat in two unplanned calls, and made partial progress on four different things — but the Q2 forecast you've been avoiding is still untouched. You leave the office uncertain whether the day was productive, carrying the same vague dread into the evening with no clear plan for tomorrow.”

×Vague — nothing concrete to act on.
Specimen BCalibrated
With Ivy Lee Method

“The night before, you wrote six tasks in importance order and closed your laptop. The next morning you opened with the Q2 forecast and didn't check email until it was done — by 10:45am. Client callback by 11:15. Website brief started at 11:30. Three meaningful items complete before lunch. At 5pm you wrote tomorrow's six, noted two carry-forwards, and left without the dread. The whole planning ritual took eight minutes.”

Specific, grounded, and ends with one clear next step.
Fig.02A real session, unedited
In-app · assistant
Ivy Lee MethodClaude
Ivy Lee Method
Let's build your Ivy Lee list for tomorrow — six tasks, ranked by importance, ready before you close up for the day. The rules: exactly six, no more; ranked by what truly matters, not what feels loudest; and tomorrow you start on #1 immediately and don't touch #2 until it's done.
First step: tell me everything that's on your plate right now. Don't filter yet — just name it all.
Okay... I need to finish the Q2 forecast, respond to about 30 emails, prep for a team meeting Thursday, review a contract my lawyer sent, start the website redesign brief I've been putting off for weeks, call back a client who's been waiting two days, and update the project tracker.
That's seven items — we need to cut one and rank the rest. But before we rank, I want to separate importance from urgency. The client callback and the emails feel urgent because someone is waiting. But if you woke up next week and hadn't written the website redesign brief, what would the real consequence be? And same question for the Q2 forecast?
The forecast is due Friday to my CFO — non-negotiable. The redesign brief... it blocks the whole project, but nothing explodes tomorrow if I skip it again. Which is exactly why it keeps getting skipped.
That's the Ivy Lee distinction precisely. The forecast is both important and urgent — that's your #1. The website brief is important but not urgent, which is exactly why it keeps losing to noisier items. Lee's method says that kind of work belongs on the list because it matters — and it needs a protected slot or it will never happen.
The client callback is urgent and the relationship cost of another day is real. Does it rank above the brief?
Yes — client callback #2, then the brief at #3. I've been avoiding it long enough.
Agreed. For the last three slots: contract review, Thursday meeting prep, and project tracker. The contract has legal implications — how long has it been unreviewed?
Since Monday. Lawyer wants feedback by end of week. That's #4. Meeting prep #5, tracker last — it's mostly admin.
Your Daily Six is locked:
1.
Complete Q2 forecast (due Friday to CFO)2. Call back client — two days outstanding3. Write website redesign brief (blocking the project)4. Review and annotate lawyer's contract5. Prepare Thursday team meeting agenda6. Update project tracker
Email triage doesn't make the cut today — it's urgent noise, not important work. Tomorrow morning: open this list and start on #1. No email first. The forecast gets your first uninterrupted hours. Don't touch #2 until it's done. At end of day tomorrow, we run the carry-forward review and lock the next list.
Reply to Ivy Lee Method
What the skill is doing
01Six-Task Elicitation
02Importance vs. Urgency Ranking
03Daily Six List Builder
Fig.03The same skill, in the channel you already use
WhatsApp · live
9:41
ILIvy Lee Methodtyping…
Messages are end-to-end encrypted. No one outside of this chat can read them.
Today
Okay... I need to finish the Q2 forecast, respond to about 30 emails, prep for a team meeting Thursday, review a contract my lawyer sent, start the we…9:14✓✓
Let's build your Ivy Lee list for tomorrow — six tasks, ranked by importance, ready before you close up for the day.9:14
The rules: exactly six, no more; ranked by what truly matters, not what feels loudest; and tomorrow you start on #1 immediately an…9:15
First step: tell me everything that's on your plate right now.9:15
Message

The same skill, where the work happens.

No new app to learn. The methodology runs over the WhatsApp Business API, so the answer lands as a reply in the thread you’re already in — same rigour, zero context-switch.

Reads the situation, names the pattern, returns one concrete next move.
Delivered in seconds, inside a conversation that already exists.
Specimen · WhatsApp Business API · live
Capabilities

What it does, specifically.

Each capability is a distinct move drawn straight from the source methodology — not a generic assistant guessing.

CapabilityC-01

Six-Task Elicitation

Through structured conversation, this capability surfaces everything competing for your attention — projects, deadlines, lingering commitments, carry-over items — and helps you ruthlessly filter down to the six tasks that will actually matter tomorrow. The act of naming and narrowing is itself clarifying.

Rooted in the method's hard cap of six tasks, which Lee designed to force genuine prioritization and prevent the list-bloat that makes conventional to-do systems fail under real workload pressure.
CapabilityC-02

Importance vs. Urgency Ranking

The most demanding and most commonly skipped step. The skill coaches you through the distinction between what feels urgent — deadline pressure, other people's waiting — and what is truly important: highest-impact work that will matter next week, not just tomorrow morning. Tasks are ranked only after this distinction has been applied.

Lee's original instruction was explicit: rank by importance, not urgency and not ease — a distinction that separates the Ivy Lee Method from an ordinary daily checklist and is documented in every credible secondary account, including James Clear's canonical explainer at jamesclear.com/ivy-lee.
CapabilityC-03

Daily Six List Builder

Produces the method's sole artifact: a clean, numbered list of exactly six tasks in priority order, each phrased as a concrete, completable action. The list becomes your contract with yourself — your complete execution plan for the next workday, decided before the morning begins.

The list is the method's only deliverable, as described in all documented accounts of Lee's 1918 consultation. Its power comes not from the paper but from the pre-commitment it represents: you have already decided, under no immediate pressure, what tomorrow is for.
CapabilityC-04

Serial Focus Protocol

Explains and reinforces the behavioral rule that gives the ranked list its power: begin on task #1 and work on it exclusively until it is complete before touching task #2. The skill explains why this rule matters — context-switching overhead, decision fatigue, the cost of partial progress — and how to hold the rule when interruptions and competing pressures arrive.

Serial single-tasking is the execution half of Lee's method. Without it, a ranked list reverts to an ordinary to-do that can be worked in any order; the method's documented productivity gains depend entirely on this sequencing discipline being followed.
CapabilityC-05

Carry-Forward Review

At day's end, the skill walks you through each item on today's list: what was completed, what wasn't, and what each unfinished task means for tomorrow. Unfinished items don't vanish — but they also don't automatically re-enter the next day's six. They compete alongside new candidates, enforcing genuine daily re-prioritization rather than silent backlog inheritance.

The carry-forward mechanism is explicit in Lee's original protocol: unfinished tasks migrate to the following day's fresh list of six, where they must again earn their position by importance — preventing yesterday's list from becoming tomorrow's obligation by default.
Tested

Graded before it shipped.

Every skill is scored against independent scenarios for methodology fidelity before it goes live — not vibes, a rubric.

What it produces
OutputD-01

Daily Six Priority List

A numbered list of exactly six tasks for tomorrow, ranked in order of true importance. Each item is written as a concrete, completable action — specific enough that you know unambiguously when it's done. This is the only artifact the Ivy Lee Method requires.

OutputD-02

Importance vs. Urgency Breakdown

A structured analysis of your candidate tasks that makes explicit which are genuinely important vs. which merely feel urgent. Used to validate the final ranking before the list is locked, so your #1 slot reflects real priority rather than the loudest voice in the room.

OutputD-03

Carry-Forward Log

A record of tasks not completed on their assigned day, along with their original priority position and a disposition decision for each: migrate to tomorrow's six, defer to a specific future date, or drop entirely. Keeps every open loop visible and intentionally managed.

The source

Grounded in the original work.

Every answer traces back to a real source and the practitioner who wrote it — not a secondhand summary. Here is the source of record.

Source authorA-01

Ivy Lee

Ivy Lee (1877–1934) was an American efficiency consultant and one of the founding figures of modern public relations. In 1918 he was engaged by Charles M. Schwab, president of Bethlehem Steel Corporation, to improve executive productivity. Lee spent 15 minutes with each executive, asked nothing upfront, and instructed them to try his six-task method for three months — then pay whatever they felt it was worth. Schwab sent a check for $25,000 (approximately $400,000 in today's dollars), later calling it among the most profitable advice he had ever received. Lee left no books or written frameworks; the method survives through a well-attested historical account documented by modern productivity authors including James Clear, Cal Newport, and Brian Tracy.

Status · Inspired by Ivy Lee’s work — not yet claimed. Are you Ivy Lee?
Primary sourceS-01

The Ivy Lee Method (1918 Consulting Framework, Bethlehem Steel)

by Ivy Lee

Pioneering management consultant and PR practitioner; 1918 Bethlehem Steel engagement; method validated with $25,000 payment (~$400,000 today) by Charles M. Schwab; subsequently documented by James Clear (Atomic Habits), Cal Newport, and Brian Tracy.

Read the original ↗
Citationjamesclear.com
In the build queue

Be first to run it.

Ivy Lee Method is being built right now. Leave your email and we’ll tell you the moment it goes live.

Notify meEmail
At launchI have too many tasks scattered across my head, my inbox, and three different lists — and I never seem to get to the important ones. Can you help me build my Ivy Lee list for tomorrow?