Sign inGet started
Skills / Leadership-development

Korn Ferry Leadership Architect

Roughly 70 percent of development comes from on-the-job stretch experiences, 20 percent from working with and learning from others, and 10 percent from formal training and coursework. Most organizations have this exactly backwards.

The Korn Ferry Leadership Architect (KFLA) is a research-backed competency framework used by thousands of Fortune 500 companies to assess leaders, build development plans, and guide succession decisions. Originally developed by Michael Lombardo and Robert Eichinger at Lominger International, it maps leadership capability to 38 defined competencies across 4 factors — Thought, Results, People, and Self — each with explicit Skilled, Unskilled, and Overused behavioral anchors. This skill applies the KFLA methodology to help HR professionals, executive coaches, and talent managers run competency gap analyses, build Individual Development Plans, design behavioral interview guides, and facilitate succession planning — all grounded in the framework's structured, repeatable process.

By Michael Lombardo & Robert Eichinger (Lominger International, now Korn Ferry) · Free
Specimen 01 · Live diagnosisKorn Ferry Leadership Architect
Input

“It's for me. I was recently promoted to VP and my 360 feedback came back with some concerns. My manager said I'm strong on driving results but people…”

Diagnosis
Let's build a targeted development plan using the Korn Ferry Leadership Architect framework.
Full transcript ↓
Calibrated referenceagent-skills.ai
The gap

Identify the 2-3 competencies holding your leadership back, then build a 70-20-10 plan to close them

The KFLA framework organizes leadership into 38 competencies grouped across 4 factors (Thought, Results, People, Self) and 12 clusters, giving talent professionals a consistent language and structure to assess any leader at any level. Each competency carries tri-modal behavioral descriptors — Skilled (what good looks like), Unskilled (what the gap looks like), and Overused (how a strength becomes a liability) — enabling highly specific, non-judgmental coaching conversations. The development process follows a five-step sequence: (1) Competency card sort or assessment to identify rated strengths and gaps; (2) Cross-reference against a role-specific Leadership Architect Success Profile; (3) Prioritize 2–3 development competencies for focused attention; (4) Build a 70-20-10 Individual Development Plan using FYI development remedies; (5) Track progress through a structured IDP review cycle. Learning Agility — the ability to learn from experience and apply that learning in new situations — serves as the framework's meta-competency for identifying and developing high-potential leaders, assessed across five dimensions: Mental, People, Change, Results, and Self-Awareness Agility.

The problem

Most leadership development efforts fail because they are either too generic ('build executive presence') or too reactive (addressing whatever problem surfaced last quarter). Without a structured competency map, leaders cannot distinguish a true skill gap from an overused strength causing unintended harm — and development plans default to training courses that account for only 10% of how adults actually develop. The KFLA framework solves this by giving HR professionals, coaches, and managers a shared, research-backed language that links specific behavioral gaps to targeted on-the-job experiences.

The solution

Stop writing development plans that gather dust. Use the KFLA's 38-competency architecture to pinpoint exactly which 2–3 capabilities are limiting leadership effectiveness, then build a 70-20-10 plan that puts 90% of development where learning actually happens — in the work itself.

You bring
  • Your current role and level, or the target role you are developing toward
  • A self-assessment or 360 data indicating perceived strengths and development areas
  • The business context or key challenges facing you or your leader
  • Any prior IDP or development goals already in progress
You get
  • A prioritized list of 2–3 KFLA competencies to target, mapped to your role's success profile
  • A structured 70-20-10 Individual Development Plan with on-the-job assignments, relationship-based learning, and formal coursework for each priority competency
  • STAR-format behavioral interview questions mapped to specific competencies for talent selection or structured coaching conversations
  • A derailer analysis that flags Overused strength patterns and their likely organizational impact
In action

Watch the methodology work.

Three specimens from a single real session: the same situation, unaided and calibrated, the full transcript, and the skill answering live in the channel where the work happens.

Fig.01The same situation, two ways
Specimens A · B
Specimen AVague
Unaided

“A high-performing VP has a 360 showing strong results delivery but peer feedback that she 'bulldozes decisions' and 'doesn't read the room politically.' Her development plan from the prior year says 'improve collaboration and executive presence' — two items with no behavioral specificity, no activities, and no measures. The plan hasn't been opened since the review cycle ended.”

×Vague — nothing concrete to act on.
Specimen BCalibrated
With Korn Ferry Leadership Architect

“The same VP has a KFLA-grounded IDP identifying two specific competencies: 'Collaborates' (Overuse of Drives Results) and 'Organizational Savvy' (Unskilled gap). The 70% development activity is a cross-functional transformation initiative where she has accountability but no authority — the highest-leverage assignment for both competencies. She has a monthly coaching cadence mapped to FYI development remedies, and her manager has STAR behavioral questions to assess progress at the 6-month mark. The derailer analysis flagged that overusing 'Action Oriented' in ambiguous situations is her most likely VP-level failure mode — she can see it clearly now and has a concrete check to apply before major decisions.”

Specific, grounded, and ends with one clear next step.
Fig.02A real session, unedited
In-app · assistant
Korn Ferry Leadership ArchitectClaude
Korn Ferry Leadership Architect
Let's build a targeted development plan using the Korn Ferry Leadership Architect framework. To start, I need to understand your context: What's your current role and level, and what's driving the development conversation right now — is this for yourself, a direct report, or someone you're coaching?
It's for me. I was recently promoted to VP and my 360 feedback came back with some concerns. My manager said I'm strong on driving results but people feel like I steamroll them in decisions. I also tend to avoid the political side of the organization.
That pattern maps clearly in the KFLA framework. What you're describing sounds like two distinct issues: first, an Overuse pattern on a Results-factor competency — likely 'Drives Results' or 'Action Oriented' being applied in ways that compress the People factor. When a strength is overused, the KFLA framework treats it differently from a true skill gap — it's not about developing something you lack, it's about calibrating something you have too much of in certain contexts.
Second, the political navigation gap likely maps to 'Organizational Savvy' or 'Manages Ambiguity' — both in the People factor. At the VP level, the KFLA success profile typically rates these as mission-critical, since you're now operating across boundaries you don't control.
Before we go further: in your 360, did the feedback mention specific situations where the steamrolling showed up — decision meetings, cross-functional projects, something else?
Mostly in cross-functional project meetings. My team loves working with me but peers from other functions feel cut out. And yes, I genuinely don't know how to read the organization's political landscape — I've always just put my head down and delivered.
That clarifies both development needs precisely. Here's the KFLA-grounded diagnosis:
Priority 1 — Overuse: Drives Results → impacting 'Collaborates'Your Drives Results strength is showing as Overused when crossing functional lines: the Unskilled descriptor for 'Collaborates' often reads as 'may pursue own agenda at the expense of the broader group.' The fix isn't to back off results — it's to add 'Collaborates' as a deliberate practice in cross-functional contexts. The FYI development remedies for this competency center on explicitly creating shared ownership before decisions are made.
Priority 2 — Unskilled: Organizational SavvyThis is a genuine gap, not an overuse pattern. The KFLA Unskilled descriptor for 'Organizational Savvy' includes 'may be unaware of or uncomfortable navigating the informal power structure.' For someone at VP level, this is a high-stakes development need.
For a 70-20-10 IDP, the 70% on-the-job anchor for Organizational Savvy would be taking on a cross-functional initiative where you have accountability but no authority — that's the single most powerful developmental assignment for this competency. Want me to build out the full IDP from here?
Yes, and also — my skip-level wants to use competency-based interviewing when we backfill my old director role. Can you help with that too?
Absolutely. For the director backfill, we'd first build a Leadership Architect Success Profile for that role — identifying which KFLA competencies are mission-critical at the director level versus nice-to-have. Given your context, I'd expect 'Drives Results,' 'Plans and Aligns,' and 'Builds Effective Teams' to be mission-critical, with 'Collaborates' as important.
For each mission-critical competency, I'll generate 2–3 STAR-format behavioral questions with probing follow-ups and behavioral evidence indicators tied to the Skilled descriptors. For example, for 'Builds Effective Teams' at director level:
Lead question: 'Tell me about a time you inherited a team that wasn't performing. Walk me through how you assessed the situation and what you changed.'Probes: 'How did you determine which performance issues were skill gaps versus motivation issues?' / 'What did you do differently with people who weren't going to make it?'Skilled evidence to listen for: Creates team identity and shared accountability, adjusts approach to individual, acts decisively on sustained underperformance.
Should I generate the full interview guide for the top 4 competencies, and then finish your IDP for Organizational Savvy and Collaborates?
That's exactly what I needed. I didn't realize the overuse angle was so different from a normal gap — that reframe changes how I think about my 360 feedback completely.
Reply to Korn Ferry Leadership Architect
What the skill is doing
01Competency Gap Diagnosis
0270-20-10 IDP Builder
03Behavioral STAR Interview Guide Generator
Fig.03The same skill, in the channel you already use
WhatsApp · live
9:41
KFKorn Ferry Leadership Architecttyping…
Messages are end-to-end encrypted. No one outside of this chat can read them.
Today
It's for me. I was recently promoted to VP and my 360 feedback came back with some concerns. My manager said I'm strong on driving results but people…9:14✓✓
Let's build a targeted development plan using the Korn Ferry Leadership Architect framework.9:14
Message

The same skill, where the work happens.

No new app to learn. The methodology runs over the WhatsApp Business API, so the answer lands as a reply in the thread you’re already in — same rigour, zero context-switch.

Reads the situation, names the pattern, returns one concrete next move.
Delivered in seconds, inside a conversation that already exists.
Specimen · WhatsApp Business API · live
Capabilities

What it does, specifically.

Each capability is a distinct move drawn straight from the source methodology — not a generic assistant guessing.

CapabilityC-01

Competency Gap Diagnosis

Guides users through a structured self-assessment against the KFLA's 38 competencies and 4-factor architecture to identify true gaps versus strength overuse. The output is a prioritized shortlist of 2–3 development competencies calibrated to the user's role and business context — the same triage logic used in Lominger's card sort facilitation.

Based on the KFLA's competency card sort process and cross-referencing against a Leadership Architect Success Profile that defines which competencies are most critical for a given role level.
CapabilityC-02

70-20-10 IDP Builder

Generates a structured Individual Development Plan for each priority competency, allocating development activities across the 70-20-10 model: stretch on-the-job assignments (70%), coaching relationships, mentors, and feedback sources (20%), and targeted formal learning (10%). Each recommendation maps directly to FYI development remedy categories.

Directly applies Lombardo and Eichinger's 70-20-10 research finding that the majority of meaningful leadership development occurs through experience, not coursework — and the FYI: For Your Improvement development remedy taxonomy organized by competency.
CapabilityC-03

Behavioral STAR Interview Guide Generator

Creates competency-specific behavioral interview questions in STAR format (Situation, Task, Action, Result) mapped to selected KFLA competencies. Each question is paired with probing follow-ups and behavioral indicators to help interviewers assess evidence of skilled, unskilled, or developing performance.

Based on Lominger's behavioral interviewing methodology that maps STAR-structured questions directly to KFLA competency definitions, used by talent acquisition teams for selection and promotion decisions.
CapabilityC-04

Derailer & Overuse Pattern Detection

Examines a leader's self-reported strengths and maps them to the KFLA's Overused behavioral descriptors, surfacing how high-performing capabilities can become liabilities when applied without situational judgment. Produces a derailer risk profile with specific behavioral patterns to watch for.

Built on the KFLA's tri-modal competency model — the Overused descriptor for each of the 38 competencies documents specific ways that strengths become organizational blind spots, a distinctive feature of the Lominger framework not present in most competency libraries.
CapabilityC-05

Learning Agility Profiling

Guides users through the five dimensions of Learning Agility — Mental, People, Change, Results, and Self-Awareness Agility — to assess a leader's capacity to learn from experience and perform effectively in new or ambiguous situations. Produces a narrative Learning Agility profile useful for high-potential identification and succession slating.

Learning Agility was introduced by Lombardo and Eichinger as the primary differentiator of high-potential leaders and underpins Korn Ferry's Choices® and viaEdge® validated assessment instruments, which measure the same five dimensions.
Tested

Graded before it shipped.

Every skill is scored against independent scenarios for methodology fidelity before it goes live — not vibes, a rubric.

What it produces
OutputD-01

Individual Development Plan (IDP)

A structured, one-page development plan documenting the leader's top 2–3 priority competencies, their specific behavioral gaps, and a 70-20-10 activity plan with timelines, success indicators, and accountability checkpoints. Formatted for manager and HR review.

OutputD-02

Competency Gap Scorecard

A prioritized view of the leader's rated competency profile across the KFLA's 4 factors and 12 clusters, flagging top development needs, validated strengths, and potential derailers from overuse. Useful as a coaching conversation anchor.

OutputD-03

STAR Behavioral Interview Guide

A set of 4–6 STAR-format behavioral interview questions per selected KFLA competency, including probing follow-up questions and behavioral evidence indicators to calibrate responses against the Skilled/Unskilled descriptors.

OutputD-04

Leadership Architect Success Profile

A role-specific competency map documenting which of the 38 KFLA competencies are mission-critical, important, or non-essential for a target role, used to anchor selection, development, and succession planning conversations.

The source

Grounded in the original work.

Every answer traces back to a real source and the practitioner who wrote it — not a secondhand summary. Here is the source of record.

Source authorA-01

Michael Lombardo & Robert Eichinger (Lominger International, now Korn Ferry)

Michael Lombardo and Robert Eichinger co-created the Lominger Leadership Architect while serving as researchers and faculty at the Center for Creative Leadership, then founded Lominger International to commercialize the framework. They co-authored 'FYI: For Your Improvement,' one of the most widely used leadership development planning references in corporate L&D, and 'The Leadership Machine.' Lominger International was acquired by Korn Ferry in 2011, where the framework was evolved into the current Korn Ferry Leadership Architect used across thousands of Fortune 500 organizations globally.

Status · Inspired by Michael Lombardo & Robert Eichinger (Lominger International, now Korn Ferry)’s work — not yet claimed. Are you Michael Lombardo & Robert Eichinger (Lominger International, now Korn Ferry)?
Primary sourceS-01

FYI: For Your Improvement — Competencies Development Guide; The Leadership Machine

by Michael Lombardo & Robert Eichinger (Lominger International, now Korn Ferry)

Co-founders of Lominger International; creators of the 70-20-10 learning model and the Learning Agility construct; co-authors of 'FYI: For Your Improvement' and 'The Leadership Machine'; former faculty at the Center for Creative Leadership.

Read the original ↗
Citationkornferry.com
In the build queue

Be first to run it.

Korn Ferry Leadership Architect is being built right now. Leave your email and we’ll tell you the moment it goes live.

Notify meEmail
At launchI want to run a KFLA competency gap analysis. I'm a [role/level] and my biggest development feedback is [describe the gap or 360 theme]. Can we diagnose this against the KFLA framework and figure out whether it's a skill gap, an overuse pattern, or both — then build an IDP?