Sign inGet started
Skills / Creativity-innovation

Lateral Thinking

The need to be right all the time is the biggest bar to new ideas.

Lateral Thinking is Edward de Bono's systematic toolkit for escaping the mental ruts that logical, sequential thinking reinforces. Where 'vertical thinking' deepens existing ideas, lateral thinking moves sideways — using named techniques like PO Provocations, Random Entry, Six Thinking Hats, and the Concept Fan to deliberately escape dominant patterns and reach ideas that logic alone never reaches. Designed for business strategists, product thinkers, facilitators, and anyone whose best current thinking keeps producing variations of the same answer.

By Edward de Bono · Free
Specimen 01 · Live diagnosisLateral Thinking
Input

“We're a SaaS company losing 40% of users in the first 30 days. We know they're not reaching the core value fast enough. We've tried walkthroughs,…”

Diagnosis
Let's work on your problem using lateral thinking — a structured toolkit for moving sideways past the ideas your brain naturally gravitates toward.
Full transcript ↓
Calibrated referenceagent-skills.ai
The gap

Stop digging the same hole deeper — tools for generating genuinely new ideas

De Bono's framework begins from a neuroscientific premise laid out in 'The Mechanism of Mind' (1969): the brain is a self-organizing pattern system that naturally follows dominant grooves. Vertical thinking deepens those grooves — productive for execution, fatal for genuine innovation. Lateral thinking provides a concrete toolkit to move sideways across patterns on demand. The core instruments each have named steps and produce concrete outputs: PO Provocations (deliberately absurd statements used as stepping stones, not answers), Random Entry (forcing associations from an unrelated stimulus to reach new neural pathways), the Concept Fan (fanning from a goal through broad concepts to specific actionable directions), PMI Analysis (structured Plus/Minus/Interesting evaluation before any judgment), Six Thinking Hats (parallel thinking in six pure modes: White for data, Red for emotion, Black for caution, Yellow for optimism, Green for creativity, Blue for process), the Challenge technique (questioning assumptions without criticism), CAF (Consider All Factors), and APC (Alternatives, Possibilities, Choices). Every session ends with harvested ideas, named artifacts, and a traceable trail — not just a feeling of creativity.

The problem

Most teams call brainstorming 'creative thinking' and then produce the same five ideas they always generate — because the brain's pattern-following strength is also its weakness. Dominant solutions crowd out genuinely new ones, and logical debate reinforces existing positions rather than opening new territory. De Bono identified this as the fundamental constraint: you cannot reach sub-dominant patterns by digging the same hole deeper.

The solution

Apply specific lateral thinking tools to any problem and reliably arrive at ideas you would not have reached through logic or conventional brainstorming — every session produces harvested concepts and named artifacts, not just a sense of inspiration.

You bring
  • The problem, challenge, or decision you are working on
  • Your current best thinking — so we can deliberately move away from it
  • Relevant constraints, context, or domain information
  • Willingness to follow an absurd stepping stone before evaluating where it leads
You get
  • A harvested idea list — viable concepts extracted from provocations and random stimuli, not incremental variations
  • A completed PMI table — Plus, Minus, and Interesting analysis of your top ideas before premature judgment closes off options
  • A Concept Fan map — goal fanned to broad concepts fanned to specific actionable directions across the full solution space
  • A Six Hats analysis — each thinking mode documented and synthesized into a balanced view no single-mode approach could produce
In action

Watch the methodology work.

Three specimens from a single real session: the same situation, unaided and calibrated, the full transcript, and the skill answering live in the channel where the work happens.

Fig.01The same situation, two ways
Specimens A · B
Specimen AVague
Unaided

“Your product team has spent three sprints trying to fix user onboarding. Every solution proposed — a shorter walkthrough, a progress bar, a check-in email on day three — is a variation on the same approach. The retro surfaces the same debate. You are not generating new ideas; you are refining existing ones that have already failed to move the retention metric.”

×Vague — nothing concrete to act on.
Specimen BCalibrated
With Lateral Thinking

“After a 30-minute PO Provocation session, two concepts are on the whiteboard that were not in the room before: a pre-signup functional sandbox and an intent-inferred onboarding path built from first-session behavior signals. A PMI Analysis has stress-tested both. A Concept Fan has mapped the solution space from 'accelerate time-to-value' through five distinct concepts to fourteen specific directions. The team knows which ideas to prototype, in which order, and why — and they have a traceable record showing exactly how each idea was reached.”

Specific, grounded, and ends with one clear next step.
Fig.02A real session, unedited
In-app · assistant
Lateral ThinkingClaude
Lateral Thinking
Let's work on your problem using lateral thinking — a structured toolkit for moving sideways past the ideas your brain naturally gravitates toward. Before we pick a tool, tell me: what's the problem, and what's your current best thinking on it? I want to know what we're deliberately moving away from.
We're a SaaS company losing 40% of users in the first 30 days. We know they're not reaching the core value fast enough. We've tried walkthroughs, tooltips, email sequences — nothing's moved the needle much.
Good. You're stuck in the 'onboarding-as-instruction' paradigm — every solution you've listed is a variation of 'explain the product better.' Let's run a PO Provocation to escape that groove.
PO: The product onboards users before they sign up.
Don't evaluate whether it's possible. That's not the point. Use it as a stepping stone: what does it lead to? What would have to be partially true for this to produce real value for a user?
Before sign-up... so like, a fully functional sandbox they can actually use before committing? Show the real product experience — not a demo video, but the actual thing working with fake data?
That's a genuine harvest — hold it, we'll come back. Now let's push sideways once more from a different angle: PO: the product already knows what the user wants to accomplish before they say anything.
If the product inferred intent from first-session behavior — what they click, where they pause, what they search — what would onboarding look like? Don't answer with 'we'd need AI.' Answer with experience: what would actually happen differently for the user in the first three minutes?
It would skip the linear tour entirely and surface just the one feature matching what they seem to be trying to do. First moment of value with zero friction — no setup wizard, no feature parade, just the thing they actually need right now.
You've now harvested two concepts that weren't in the room when we started: value-before-commitment and intent-inferred onboarding. Both came from provocations, not from refining your existing walkthroughs.
Before you build conviction around either, let's run PMI on concept two. Plus column first — list every benefit, even the obvious ones. What does intent-inferred onboarding make better?
Personalizes immediately, skips irrelevant features, reaches value faster, cuts cognitive load, makes the product feel like it understands you from day one. And — I just realized — if we log those first-session signals, we also get data about what users actually want, not what we assumed they wanted.
Reply to Lateral Thinking
What the skill is doing
01PO Provocation Engine
02Random Entry Sessions
03Six Thinking Hats Sequencing
Fig.03The same skill, in the channel you already use
WhatsApp · live
9:41
LTLateral Thinkingtyping…
Messages are end-to-end encrypted. No one outside of this chat can read them.
Today
We're a SaaS company losing 40% of users in the first 30 days. We know they're not reaching the core value fast enough. We've tried walkthroughs, tool…9:14✓✓
Let's work on your problem using lateral thinking — a structured toolkit for moving sideways past the ideas your brain naturally g…9:14
Before we pick a tool, tell me: what's the problem, and what's your current best thinking on it?9:15
I want to know what we're deliberately moving away from.9:15
Message

The same skill, where the work happens.

No new app to learn. The methodology runs over the WhatsApp Business API, so the answer lands as a reply in the thread you’re already in — same rigour, zero context-switch.

Reads the situation, names the pattern, returns one concrete next move.
Delivered in seconds, inside a conversation that already exists.
Specimen · WhatsApp Business API · live
Capabilities

What it does, specifically.

Each capability is a distinct move drawn straight from the source methodology — not a generic assistant guessing.

CapabilityC-01

PO Provocation Engine

Generates deliberately absurd or impossible statements about your problem and uses them as stepping stones — not answers. The PO operator signals the statement's role: 'PO cars have no engines,' 'PO the product onboards before sign-up.' The harvest step that follows extracts viable concepts from the downstream thinking the provocation triggers, turning impossibility into direction.

Based on de Bono's Provocative Operation technique: the statement does not need to be plausible — it needs to move thinking into a region of the pattern space the brain would not reach through directed logic, after which feasible concepts are harvested from what the stepping stone reveals.
CapabilityC-02

Random Entry Sessions

Introduces a genuinely unrelated stimulus — a random word, object, or image — then systematically forces associations between that stimulus and the problem. Because the stimulus has no logical connection, it jogs the brain into neural pathways that directed thinking cannot reach by definition.

Based on de Bono's Random Entry technique from 'Lateral Thinking' (1970): the random word's properties and associations are listed first, then each is forced against the problem domain to extract viable concepts — a process that exploits the asymmetry of self-organizing pattern systems described in 'The Mechanism of Mind' (1969).
CapabilityC-03

Six Thinking Hats Sequencing

Guides a user or team through all six hat perspectives in a defined sequence: White (data and facts), Red (emotions and intuition), Black (caution and risks), Yellow (optimism and benefits), Green (new ideas), Blue (process and meta-thinking). Each hat is worn fully before switching — preventing the adversarial debate that collapses collaborative thinking into position-defense.

Based on de Bono's Six Thinking Hats (1985): parallel thinking ensures everyone examines the same dimension simultaneously, eliminating ego-defense and hierarchy effects. The hat sequence is designed in advance by the Blue hat role — typically Blue → White → Green → Yellow → Black → Red → Blue.
CapabilityC-04

PMI Analysis

Before judging any idea, systematically completes all three columns: Plus (every benefit, however obvious), Minus (every cost and risk), and Interesting (things neither good nor bad but worth noting — adjacent possibilities, implications, questions). The Interesting column is the most cognitively demanding and the most valuable, capturing directions that binary judgment would close off.

Based on de Bono's PMI tool from the CoRT Thinking Program: the three-column structure forces the mind to exhaust each dimension before evaluating — preventing the snap judgments that kill potentially valuable ideas before their implications can be explored.
CapabilityC-05

Concept Fan Expansion

Starts with a stated goal at the center and fans outward: first to broad concepts (ways of achieving the goal), then each concept fans to specific directions, then to specific ideas. When ideas feel too incremental, the fan widens by stepping back to a higher-order concept — ensuring the full solution space is mapped before convergence.

Based on de Bono's Concept Fan from 'Serious Creativity' (1992): the layered structure separates concept-level thinking from idea-level thinking, preventing premature convergence on a single approach before genuinely different directions have been identified and mapped.
Tested

Graded before it shipped.

Every skill is scored against independent scenarios for methodology fidelity before it goes live — not vibes, a rubric.

What it produces
OutputD-01

PO Stepping Stone Log

A structured record of each provocation generated, the associations it triggered, and the viable concepts harvested from each stepping stone — giving you a complete, traceable trail from impossible statement to actionable idea.

OutputD-02

PMI Analysis Table

A three-column table (Plus / Minus / Interesting) completed for your top ideas, with the Interesting column actively coached to surface implications, adjacent possibilities, and directions the idea opens up that good-or-bad judgment would miss.

OutputD-03

Concept Fan Map

A layered expansion from your goal through broad concept levels to specific actionable directions, showing the full solution space before you converge — making visible which concepts remain unexplored.

OutputD-04

Six Hats Analysis

A hat-by-hat transcript capturing each thinking mode's full perspective on your problem or decision, synthesized into a balanced view that no single-mode analysis — and no conventional debate — could produce.

The source

Grounded in the original work.

Every answer traces back to a real source and the practitioner who wrote it — not a secondhand summary. Here is the source of record.

Source authorA-01

Edward de Bono

Edward de Bono (1933–2021) was a Maltese physician, psychologist, and prolific author who coined the term 'lateral thinking' in 1967. Over five decades he wrote more than 80 books translated into 40+ languages, developed the CoRT Thinking Program adopted in national school curricula across multiple countries, and built a global training organization. His Six Thinking Hats framework is used at board level by companies including IBM, Boeing, British Airways, and ABB.

Status · Inspired by Edward de Bono’s work — not yet claimed. Are you Edward de Bono?
Primary sourceS-01

Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step

by Edward de Bono

Maltese physician and psychologist; coined 'lateral thinking' 1967; author of 80+ books in 40+ languages; Six Thinking Hats adopted by IBM, Boeing, British Airways, ABB; CoRT Thinking Program in national curricula worldwide.

Read the original ↗
Citationdebonogroup.com
In the build queue

Be first to run it.

Lateral Thinking is being built right now. Leave your email and we’ll tell you the moment it goes live.

Notify meEmail
At launchI'm stuck on a problem and my best thinking keeps producing variations of the same approach. Can we run a PO Provocation to escape the pattern? The problem is: [describe your problem here].